October 5, 2026
Is California Training Enough Therapists? The Clinician Pipeline, Year by Year
Quick Answer
Is California training enough therapists?
Not more than it was. New California therapists, psychologists, psychiatrists, and psychiatric nurse practitioners entering the federal NPI registry averaged 7,317 a year in 2015-2019 and 7,203 a year in 2021-2025, a -2% change, while the state's population also stayed flat. Inside that line the mix moved: new clinical social workers fell 26% from their 2018 peak, new psychologists fell 22%, and new psychiatric nurse practitioners more than doubled and have outnumbered newly registered psychiatrists every year since 2021. The 2018 UCSF projection of an 11% therapist shortfall and a 41% psychiatrist shortfall by 2028 assumed current trends would continue, and they have. Lean Medical offers therapy and psychiatry by telehealth across California, in-network with Cigna, Aetna, and Blue Shield of California.
California added about 7,203 new behavioral health clinicians a year over 2021-2025, by the federal registry's count. That is the same number it added a year in 2015-2019. The population is the same too. The pipeline is not growing, and inside it, the mix is moving away from the clinicians the public system leans on most.
New California clinicians registered in 2025, 17% below the 2019 peak and the lowest since 2015
New clinical social workers, 2018 to 2025: 1,955 down to 1,443
New psychiatric nurse practitioners vs newly registered psychiatrists in 2025; NPs have led every year since 2021
The short answer
No, not more than before. Every clinician who bills insurance needs a National Provider Identifier, and the federal registry records the day it was issued. Count California records by that date, in the taxonomies for psychiatry, psychiatric nursing, psychology, marriage and family therapy, clinical social work, and professional counseling, and you get a year-by-year tally of people entering the workforce. From 2015 to 2019 it averaged 7,317 a year. From 2021 to 2025 it averaged 7,203. The state had about 39.3 million residents in both windows, so per resident the pipeline is where it was: 18.4 new clinicians per 100,000 Californians a year, against 18.6 before.
The 2018 UCSF Healthforce Center projection said California would be 41 percent short of psychiatrists and 11 percent short of psychologists, therapists, counselors, and clinical social workers by 2028 "if current trends continue." Lean Medical pulled the full NPPES file to check whether they did. They did. The datasets are downloadable below. This is what they show.
What the data shows
The line is flat, and the end of it points down. New registrations peaked at 7,982 in 2019, dropped to 6,821 in 2020, recovered to about 7,500 in 2021 and 2022, and have slid since: 6,621 in 2025, the lowest full year since 2015. January through August of 2026 brought 4,024 new clinicians against 4,447 in the same months of 2025, -10%. The most recent years are the ones most likely to be revised upward as trainees reclassify their records, but the master's-level licenses that make up most of the total do not carry that lag.
Clinical social workers are the sharpest drop. New LCSW-track registrations peaked at 1,955 in 2018 and fell to 1,443 in 2025, down 26%; January-August 2026 ran 752 against 983 a year earlier. The state's licensing data points the same way: complete applications for a new Associate Clinical Social Worker registration fell from 3,754 in fiscal 2022-23 to 2,306 in 2024-25 (DCA annual licensing statistics). This is the license the public system runs on. County mental health plans, hospitals, community clinics, and the Medi-Cal specialty system are staffed disproportionately by clinical social workers, so a shrinking LCSW pipeline lands hardest on the patients with the fewest alternatives.
Psychologists are entering at a lower rate than a decade ago. New psychologist registrations averaged 727 a year in 2015-2019 and 571 in 2021-2025, a 22% decline. The Board of Psychology reports 878 licenses issued in 2019 and 834 in 2020, roughly 620 to 750 complete licensure applications a year since, and an active licensee count that grew only 5 percent in three years, from 19,543 to 20,585. Our county map of the psychologist workforce showed where the existing supply sits; this is the rate at which it is being replaced.
Psychiatric nurse practitioners doubled and overtook psychiatrists. New psychiatric NP and clinical nurse specialist registrations averaged 191 a year in 2015-2019 and 417 in 2021-2025, +118%. They first edged past newly registered psychiatrists in 2019, and from 2021 on they have led every year; in 2025 the count was 471 to 74. The psychiatrist figure needs a caveat: a physician usually gets an NPI in residency under a student taxonomy and switches it to psychiatry later, so the registry undercounts psychiatry cohorts from about 2022 on. The reliable window, 2010-2019, averaged 274 new California psychiatrists a year with no upward trend, while UCSF counted 45 percent of the state's psychiatrists as over 60. Whoever prescribes for the next decade, the registry says it will increasingly be a nurse practitioner. Our guide to online psychiatry in California explains what that means for prescribing.
Marriage and family therapists hold the line. LMFT-track registrations went from 1,950 in 2010 to a record 3,089 in 2024 and 2,725 in 2025, and they make up 39 percent of all new clinicians in the 2021-2025 window. Professional clinical counselor taxonomies ran 1,455 to 1,986 a year over the same period. California's therapy workforce is, more each year, an LMFT workforce; our county map of LMFTs and LCSWs shows where they practice.
The pipeline is leaving the Bay Area. Mapping each new clinician's practice ZIP to a county, the nine Bay Area counties took 25.8 percent of new registrations in 2010-2014 and 19.4 percent in 2021-2025, falling from about 1,559 a year to 1,376. San Francisco, Marin, Alameda, and San Mateo all added fewer new clinicians a year than they did a decade ago. Los Angeles County rose from 26.8 to 29.6 percent and the Inland Empire from 7.6 to 8.5 percent. The San Joaquin Valley, the region with the thinnest workforce per resident, held at about 7 percent of new clinicians, so the geographic gap the county maps documented is not closing from the supply side.
Two registration surges are not new supply. School psychologist registrations jumped from 69 in 2023 to 648 in 2025 and 1,053 in the first nine months of 2026; school counselors went from 25 to 1,349. These are existing school staff getting NPIs so their districts can bill Medi-Cal under the CYBHI school-linked fee schedule, which launched in January 2024, not new clinicians, and they are excluded from the totals above. The other surge is real but different: 32,146 behavior technicians registered in 2025, almost five times the entire licensed pipeline, as ABA therapy for autism scaled under insurance mandates. Anyone counting "psychologists" in the registry after 2024 needs to drop the school code first.
Why this matters
If you are looking for a therapist, the supply behind every directory is not growing, and in the Central Valley and Inland Empire it is barely being replaced. That makes the network your plan has built matter more than the statewide headcount, which is the same conclusion our wait-times report card reached from the other direction. Telehealth widens the pool to every California-licensed clinician, which is why therapy by video is often the fastest route to an opening outside the coastal metros.
If you are on Medi-Cal or rely on a county program, the LCSW decline is the number to watch. The state is spending heavily to reverse it: the Behavioral Health Services Act now sets aside at least three percent of its funds for workforce programs, and HCAI has put $37.6 million into psychiatric nurse practitioner training alone. The registry will show whether it works. We will update this series when the next full file is published.
If you need a prescriber, expect the person across the screen to be a psychiatric nurse practitioner more often than a psychiatrist, and expect that share to keep rising. Our psychiatry service is staffed on exactly that model. The full picture of where the existing workforce sits, and how it compares to population, is in our California Behavioral Health Access Index.
New California clinicians by year and license type, 2010-2026
Download CSVIndividual California practitioners entering the NPI registry each year, by primary behavioral health taxonomy. "Total" is the six licensed psychotherapy and psychiatry groups shown; school, addiction, and ABA taxonomies are in the CSV but not in the total. Per 100,000 uses the Census population estimate for that year. 2026 covers registrations through September 13, 2026.
| Year | Total | Per 100k | Psychiatrists | Psychiatric NPs | Psychologists | LMFTs | LCSWs | LPCCs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 5,690 | 15.2 | 315 | 70 | 926 | 1,950 | 1,150 | 1,279 |
| 2011 | 5,917 | 15.7 | 286 | 87 | 869 | 2,059 | 1,305 | 1,311 |
| 2012 | 6,228 | 16.4 | 283 | 95 | 904 | 2,224 | 1,360 | 1,362 |
| 2013 | 6,364 | 16.6 | 255 | 144 | 929 | 2,177 | 1,420 | 1,439 |
| 2014 | 6,204 | 16.1 | 281 | 113 | 716 | 2,306 | 1,413 | 1,375 |
| 2015 | 6,578 | 16.9 | 259 | 129 | 729 | 2,551 | 1,459 | 1,451 |
| 2016 | 7,096 | 18.1 | 253 | 165 | 789 | 2,700 | 1,618 | 1,571 |
| 2017 | 7,039 | 17.9 | 262 | 183 | 692 | 2,678 | 1,580 | 1,644 |
| 2018 | 7,888 | 20.0 | 273 | 205 | 731 | 2,808 | 1,955 | 1,916 |
| 2019 | 7,982 | 20.2 | 272 | 275 | 695 | 2,875 | 1,852 | 2,013 |
| 2020 | 6,821 | 17.3 | 329 | 277 | 612 | 2,401 | 1,566 | 1,636 |
| 2021 | 7,507 | 19.2 | 278 | 337 | 601 | 2,662 | 1,705 | 1,924 |
| 2022 | 7,564 | 19.3 | 242 | 388 | 566 | 2,664 | 1,718 | 1,986 |
| 2023 | 7,124 | 18.2 | 194 | 444 | 567 | 2,823 | 1,641 | 1,455 |
| 2024 | 7,201 | 18.3 | 148 | 443 | 591 | 3,089 | 1,585 | 1,345 |
| 2025 | 6,621 | 16.8 | 74 | 471 | 529 | 2,725 | 1,443 | 1,379 |
| 2026(partial) | 4,281 | n/a | 31 | 402 | 335 | 1,757 | 799 | 957 |
Psychiatrist counts from about 2022 onward are incomplete because physicians typically register during residency under a student taxonomy and reclassify later. "LPCCs" is the professional and mental health counselor taxonomies; before California's LPCC license existed (first issued 2012) those codes were used by other master's-level counselors. Clinicians who later deactivated their NPI are not in the file, so earlier years are undercounted by attrition.
Where the new clinicians practice: 2010-2014 vs 2021-2025
Download CSV| Region | New clinicians a year, 2010-14 | New clinicians a year, 2021-25 | Share, 2010-14 | Share, 2021-25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bay Area | 1,559 | 1,376 | 25.8% | 19.4% |
| Los Angeles County | 1,620 | 2,107 | 26.8% | 29.6% |
| Southern coast | 1,299 | 1,739 | 21.5% | 24.5% |
| Inland Empire | 460 | 607 | 7.6% | 8.5% |
| Sacramento region | 317 | 433 | 5.3% | 6.1% |
| San Joaquin Valley | 418 | 468 | 6.9% | 6.6% |
| Rest of state | 360 | 378 | 6.0% | 5.3% |
Six licensed groups combined, mapped from practice ZIP code to county with the Census 2020 ZCTA-to-county file. Red figures fell. Southern coast is Orange, San Diego, Ventura, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, and Imperial counties; Sacramento region is Sacramento, Placer, El Dorado, Yolo, Sutter, and Yuba; San Joaquin Valley is San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Merced, Madera, Fresno, Kings, Tulare, and Kern. About 1 percent of records had a ZIP that could not be mapped and are excluded from shares.
Method, briefly
Source: the NPPES Data Dissemination full replacement file dated September 13, 2026 (9.8 million records), downloaded October 5, 2026. We kept individual records (Entity Type 1) with a California business practice address and at least one behavioral health taxonomy, assigned each to one group by its primary taxonomy (falling back to its first behavioral health taxonomy), and counted it once in the year of its Provider Enumeration Date. Population is the Census Bureau's Vintage 2020 series for 2010-2019 and Vintage 2025 for 2020-2025. Regions use the Census 2020 ZCTA-to-county relationship file, assigning each ZIP to the county holding most of its land area. Licensing-board figures are from the Board of Behavioral Sciences and Board of Psychology 2025 sunset review reports (Table 6) and the Department of Consumer Affairs' annual licensing statistics, where "complete applications" means applications processed, not licenses issued.
What the data does not capture. An NPI date is when a clinician registered, not when they were licensed: master's-level clinicians register as associates when they begin supervised hours, two to four years before licensure, and physicians register in residency, so the series measures entry into practice. Records deactivated for retirement or death are dropped from the file, which undercounts earlier cohorts and biases the series toward growth; the flat result is, if anything, generous. Clinicians already practicing in 2010-2013 who registered late inflate those years, which is why the comparisons anchor on 2015-2019 rather than 2010. A California practice address does not mean a clinician sees patients today, takes insurance, or has an opening, and out-of-state clinicians who see Californians by telehealth are not counted. The file carries no county of licensure, so regional figures reflect where a clinician first filed, not where they trained. This piece is part of our California Behavioral Health Access Index, the standing home of our public datasets and the analyses built on them.
Sources
- CMS, NPPES Data Dissemination: full replacement file, September 2026 (npidata_pfile_20050523-20260913).
- Coffman, Bates, Geyn, and Spetz, California's Current and Future Behavioral Health Workforce, Healthforce Center at UCSF for the California Health Care Foundation, February 2018.
- California Board of Behavioral Sciences, Sunset Review Report 2025: Table 6, Licensee Population.
- California Board of Psychology, Sunset Review Report 2025: Table 6, Licensee Population; fee study, initial licenses issued 2019-2020.
- Department of Consumer Affairs, Annual Licensing Statistics: complete-application volumes by board and transaction type, fiscal years 2021-22 through 2024-25.
- CalHHS, CYBHI Statewide Multi-Payer Fee Schedule for School-Linked Behavioral Health Services.
- Census Bureau, state population estimates, Vintage 2020 and Vintage 2025.
Key Takeaways
Key takeaways
- New California behavioral health clinicians averaged 7,203 a year in 2021-2025, -2% versus 2015-2019, with population flat: the pipeline is not growing.
- 2025 was the lowest full year since 2015, and January-August 2026 is running -10% against the same months of 2025.
- New clinical social workers fell 26% from the 2018 peak and new psychologists 22% between the two windows; new psychiatric NPs more than doubled and have outnumbered new psychiatrists every year since 2021.
- The Bay Area's share of new clinicians fell from 25.8 to 19.4 percent; the San Joaquin Valley's did not rise.
- School psychologist and school counselor registrations surged after the 2024 CYBHI fee schedule, but they are existing staff registering to bill, not new supply, and are excluded here.
Frequently asked questions
Is there a therapist shortage in California?
Yes, by the state's own projections, and the pipeline has not changed course. The 2018 UCSF Healthforce Center study projected that California would have 41 percent fewer psychiatrists than it needs by 2028 and 11 percent fewer psychologists, marriage and family therapists, clinical counselors, and clinical social workers if current trends continued. The federal registry shows new clinician registrations averaging 7,203 a year in 2021-2025, against 7,317 in 2015-2019. The shortage is also uneven: the Inland Empire and San Joaquin Valley have the fewest clinicians per resident, and the new clinicians are not closing that gap.
How many new therapists does California license each year?
The Board of Behavioral Sciences processed about 2,100 to 2,700 complete applications a year to upgrade from Associate Clinical Social Worker to LCSW between fiscal years 2021-22 and 2024-25, about 2,450 to 3,170 to upgrade from Associate MFT to LMFT, and 380 to 684 to upgrade from Associate PCC to LPCC. The Board of Psychology issued 878 psychologist licenses in 2019 and 834 in 2020, and has processed roughly 620 to 750 complete licensure applications a year since. Those are the licensing steps; the NPI registry counts people a few years earlier, when they first start seeing patients under supervision.
Why does the registry show so few new psychiatrists?
Partly because of how physicians register. A doctor usually gets an NPI during residency under a student taxonomy and only switches it to psychiatry after finishing training, so the registry cannot see a psychiatry cohort until years after its NPI date. That makes 2022 onward incomplete for psychiatrists. The reliable window is 2010-2019, when new California psychiatrists averaged 274 a year and did not grow. Over the same period, 45 percent of the state's psychiatrists were already over 60, and new psychiatric nurse practitioners went from 70 a year to 471.
Does telehealth fix a flat pipeline?
It does not add clinicians, but it changes who can reach them. Any California-licensed therapist or psychiatrist can see any Californian by video, so a patient in Fresno or San Bernardino is no longer limited to the clinicians who chose to practice there. What telehealth cannot do is make a clinician in the Bay Area take your insurance or have an opening. That is why access in practice depends on the network your plan has built, not just the statewide headcount.
What is the NPI registry, and why use it to count clinicians?
The National Provider Identifier is the federal ID every clinician needs to bill insurance, including Medi-Cal and Medicare. The registry, called NPPES, is public and records the date each NPI was issued and the clinician's practice address and specialty taxonomy. Counting California records by the year of issue gives a consistent, downloadable measure of people entering the workforce across every license type, which the state's separate licensing boards do not publish in one place. Its limits are real: it records registration rather than licensure, it drops deactivated records, and a practice address does not mean the clinician is seeing patients today.
About Lean Medical
Lean Medical is a California behavioral health practice offering therapy and psychiatry by telehealth statewide. We are in-network with Cigna, Aetna, and Blue Shield of California. We publish this data because a flat pipeline makes every existing clinician's time more valuable, and connecting that time to the patients who need it is the problem the practice exists to solve. Cite this report as "Lean Medical, California Behavioral Health Access Index" with a link to this page; the datasets are CC BY 4.0.
For patients
Find a clinician with an opening this week
See California-licensed clinicians in-network with Cigna, Aetna, and Blue Shield, with live availability.
For clinicians
Your time has never been worth more
Credentialing, billing, and a full caseload of in-network patients, so you can spend it on care.